Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CF777E3.2090701@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02.12.2010 11:02, Simon Riggs wrote: > The cause of the issue is that replay starts at one LSN and there is a > delay until the RunningXacts WAL record occurs. If there was no delay, > there would be no issue at all. In CreateCheckpoint() we start by > grabbing the WAInsertLock and later recording that pointer as part of > the checkpoint record. My proposal is to replace the "grab the lock" > code with the insert of the RunningXacts WAL record (when wal_level > set), so that recovery always starts with that record type. Oh, interesting idea. But AFAICS closing the gap between acquiring the running-xacts snapshot and writing it to the log is sufficient, I don't see what moving the running-xacts record buys us. Does it allow some further simplifications somewhere? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: