Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CF691BC.4050602@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I think the best answer is to get out of the business of using > O_DIRECT by default, especially seeing that available evidence > suggests it might not be a performance win anyway. Well, we don't have any performance evidence ... there's an issue with the fsync-test script which causes it not to use O_DIRECT. However, we haven't seen any evidence for benefits on any production filesystem, either. So given the lack of evidence of performance benefit, combined with the definite evidence of related failures, I agree that simply disabling O_DIRECT by default would be a good way to solve this. It might be nice to add new sync_method options, "osync_odirect" and "odatasync_odirect" for DBAs who think they know enough to tune with non-defaults. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: