Re: profiling connection overhead
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: profiling connection overhead |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CF614C00200002500038000@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: profiling connection overhead (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: >> Oracle's backend start up time seems to be way higher than PG's. > Interesting. How about MySQL and SQL Server? My recollection of Sybase ASE is that establishing a connection doesn't start a backend or even a thread. It establishes a network connection and associates network queues and a connection context structure with it. "Engine" threads with CPU affinity (and a few miscellaneous "worker" threads, too, if I remember right) do all the work in a queue-based fashion. Last I worked with MS SQL Server it was based on the Sybase code and therefore worked the same way. I know they've made a lot of changes in the last five years (including switching to MVCC and adding snapshot isolation in addition to the already-existing serializable isolation), so I don't know whether connection startup cost has changed along the way. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: