Re: BUG #6733: All Tables Empty After pg_upgrade (PG 9.2.0 beta 2)
От | Mike Wilson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6733: All Tables Empty After pg_upgrade (PG 9.2.0 beta 2) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CF24053-1540-4843-AC50-45F37B9FC536@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6733: All Tables Empty After pg_upgrade (PG 9.2.0 beta 2) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
core stack: root@db4 / $ pstack ~postgres/core core '/opt/postgres/core' of 19868: pg_upgrade --verbose --link --old-d= atadir=3D/opt/postgres/db/root/old -- fffffd7ffeda1148 memcpy () + 6b8 000000000040b8b6 transfer_single_new_db () + fa 000000000040b6ea transfer_all_new_dbs () + 116 000000000040ae62 main () + 106 000000000040580c ???????? () As to the ownership, the bash script I am testing 9.1.4 and 9.2.0 with recu= rsively chowns the directory that owns the old and the new PGDATA directory= before running pg_upgrade.=20=20 Mike Wilson mfwilson@gmail.com On Jul 15, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Mike Wilson <mfwilson@gmail.com> writes: >> I've had some time to examine this closer over the weekend. It >> appears that pg_upgrade for 9.2b2 segfaults which more than likely has >> something to do with the resulting converted database appearing to >> have no rows. >=20 > Yeah, more than likely :-(. Could we see a stack trace from the > segfault? >=20 >> Of possible note in this DB is that the previous DBA renamed the >> "postgres" user. >=20 > Hmm. There is a known bug in beta2 that's triggered by old and new > clusters not having the same name for the bootstrap superuser; although > I don't recall that the symptoms included a segfault. In any case, > I'd suggest making sure the new cluster is initdb'd under the same > account that currently owns the old cluster. >=20 > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: