Re: Anyone seen this kind of lock pileup?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone seen this kind of lock pileup? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CE46856.7070006@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anyone seen this kind of lock pileup? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anyone seen this kind of lock pileup?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
>> What's odd about this is that the resulting "lock pileup" takes a >> mysterious 2-3.5 seconds to clear, despite the fact that none of the >> connections are *doing* anything during that time, nor are there >> deadlock errors. In theory at least, the locks should clear out in >> reverse order in less than a second; none of the individual statements >> takes more than 10ms to execute. Ok, I've collected more data. Looks like the case I was examining was idiosyncratic; most of these lock pile-ups involve 400 or more locks waiting held by around 20 different backends. Given this, taking 3 seconds to sort that all out doesn't seem that unreasonable. Presumably there's a poll cycle of some sort for waiting statements? Anyway, the obvious answer is for the user to fix their application. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: