Re: wCTE behaviour
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wCTE behaviour |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CDEAD76.1040803@cs.helsinki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wCTE behaviour (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: wCTE behaviour
Re: wCTE behaviour |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-11-13 5:08 PM +0200, Tom Lane wrote: > Marko Tiikkaja<marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: >> On 13 Nov 2010, at 15:41, David Fetter<david@fetter.org> wrote: >>> Similarly, if a normal CTE called a data-changing function but was >>> nevertheless not referred to, it would still run. > >> Actually, it wouldn't. > > Indeed, and that was considered a feature when we did it. I think > that having wCTEs behave arbitrarily differently on this point > might be a bad idea. So these queries would behave differently? WITH t AS (DELETE FROM foo RETURNING *) SELECT 1 WHERE false; WITH t AS (DELETE FROM foo RETURNING *) SELECT 1 FROM t LIMIT 0; Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: