Re: Considering Solid State Drives
От | Joachim Worringen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Considering Solid State Drives |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CDC1B2A.4060908@iathh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Considering Solid State Drives (David Siebert <david@aretoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Am 11.11.2010 16:40, schrieb David Siebert: > ZFS has an option to use an SSD as cache for the spinning drives. ZFS > under Solaris has turned in some really good IO numbers. The problem is > with the new Sun I am not feeling so good about the open nature of > Solaris. ZFS performance under BSD I have read does not match ZFS under > Solaris. Very true. Also, we experienced (with a 32-core/64GB Sun X4600 machine and a direct-attached storage array with 24 10k-spindles) that PostgreSQL scaled *badly* (with the number of active, long-running queries) when using ZFS. Installing CentOS with XFS, the same hardware delivered very good scaling and higher absolute performance. Admitted, this were more or less out-of-the-box configurations (but we did some tuning with ZFS, which resulted in a 2x speedup - still not enough). But the difference was drastic. We went with Linux/XFS then. Joachim
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: