Re: Libpq is very slow on windows but fast on linux.
От | Antonio Goméz Soto |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Libpq is very slow on windows but fast on linux. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CDA4A7B.8080006@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Libpq is very slow on windows but fast on linux. (Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Op 10-11-10 08:22, Alban Hertroys schreef: > On 10 Nov 2010, at 5:19, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > >> Further testing shows it is windows networking causing the issue. >> Copying files to and from the server is 5 to 6 times slower on a >> Windows client compared to the Linux client. >> >> The issue is not specific to libpq. > > Do both machines have similar hardware? If the Linux machine has a proper NIC (intel, for example) while the Windows machine > has a poor NIC (Realtek!), then of course you would get differences in performance. > Not that much, in the past I have seen differences in performance between Intel and Realtek, 20-30% yes, but never by a factor of 5 or 6. Antonio > I'm not saying Microsofts network stack is particularly good, mind you, just that it isn't necessarily the main cause. > One of the problems Windows is facing is that, while supporting a lot of hardware is a good thing in general, it also > supports all the crap hardware, crap drivers and crap ACPI implementations. > > Alban Hertroys > > -- > Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling. > > > !DSPAM:737,4cda484310265265216060! > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: