Re: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CD9C51D.4030301@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages:
proposal
Re: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/9/10 1:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> 5. It would be pretty much impossible to run with autovacuum turned
> off, and in fact you would likely need to make it a good deal more
> aggressive in the specific case of aborted transactions, to mitigate
> problems #1, #3, and #4.
6. This would require us to be more aggressive about VACUUMing old-cold
relations/page, e.g. VACUUM FREEZE. This it would make one of our worst
issues for data warehousing even worse.
What about having this map (and other hintbits) be per-relation? Hmmm.That wouldn't work for DDL, I suppose ...
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: