Re: JDBC Transactions
От | Jonathan Tripathy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC Transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CCF0939.5000006@abpni.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC Transactions (Filip Rembiałkowski <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC Transactions
Re: JDBC Transactions |
Список | pgsql-general |
>> Hi Andy, >> >> Thanks for your reply. Would the above code be classed as a single >> transaction then? > Yes, assuming there's no explicit transaction control > (COMMIT/ROLLBACK/END) in your queries. Actually, we do have maybe one or 2 queries that use ROLLBACK, however ROLLBACK happens at the end of a "code block" so the question is probably moot. >> And if so, I could just simple leave out the line which >> says "//Insert SQL here to lock table"? > In PostgreSQL, locking is done automatically depending on actual > isolation level and SQL queries. > You can use explicit locking but most of the time it's not needed. > I'll give you the exact case where I'm worried: We have a table of customers, and each customer can have multiple memberships (which are stored in the memberships table). We want our deleteMembership(int membershipID) method to remove the membership, then check to see if there are no more memberships left for the corresponding customer, and if there are none, delete the corresponding customer as well.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: