Re: max_wal_senders must die
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_wal_senders must die |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CC88EC2.2080803@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_wal_senders must die (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_wal_senders must die
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> You're assuming that we should set up the default behavior to support > replication and penalize those who aren't using it. What's the penalty? Simon just said that there isn't one. And there's a difference between saying that I "failed to make a case" vs. "the cost is too great". Saying the former is saying that my argument lacks merit (or content) entirely, rather than saying that it's not sufficient. I made a case, the case just didn't persuade you ... yet. > I entirely agree that it ought to be easier to set up replication. > But there's a difference between having a big red EASY button for people > to push, and pushing it for them. If we have a single boolean GUC called "replication", I would be happy.Even if it defaulted to "off". -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: