Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CC430FB.8010201@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions
for 1.14. Now that we ha
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 24/10/2010 01:06, Dave Page a écrit : > Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we have a PostgreSQL support policy, we can follow that for new releasesof pgAdmin. > > Branch > ------ > master > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=f6acdf3429dfee7ee9a2990b8fdb75d519dd50d2 > > Modified Files > -------------- > pgadmin/include/pgAdmin3.h | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Do we really want to do that? I mean, stopping a connection if a guy is not on a PostgreSQL maintained release. Actually, there's not much to fix for theses releases in the pgAdmin's code, so why would we tell these users to use another admin tool if pgAdmin is already able to deal with them? I think a hint would be more advised. Something like: According to the PostgreSQL Support Policy, you're working on an unmaintained PostgreSQL server. You can get more details on http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Release_Support_Policy. We urge you to update your PostgreSQL release on this server. Meanwhile, you can still use pgAdmin to a certain extent. It should work flawlessly. Maybe we should add something to tell them we won't do a lots of effort to debug pgAdmin for these unmaintained releases. But I don't think we should stop them to use pgAdmin, even if they use a buggy PostgreSQL release. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: