Re: Simplifying replication
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simplifying replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CC0F10D.3000201@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simplifying replication (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simplifying replication
Re: Simplifying replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I think it's pretty well explained in the fine manual. > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-WAL-KEEP-SEGMENTS Nope. No relationship to checkpoint_segments is explained there. Try again? >> If checkpoint_segments were a hard limit, then we could let admins set >> wal_keep_segments to -1, knowing that they'd set checkpoint_segments to >> the max space they had available. > > This assumes that more checkpoint segments is always better, which > isn't true. I might have 100 GB of disk space free, but not want to > replay WAL for 4 days if I have a crash. No, it assumes no such thing. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: