Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CC078DD.3010107@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > >> full_page_writes is designed to guard against a partial write to a >> device. I don't think the raid cache can be partially written to >> > > So you're confident that an 8kB write to the controller will not be > done as a series of smaller atomic writes by the OS file system? Sure, that happens. But if the BBU has gotten an fsync call after the 8K write, it shouldn't return success until after all 8K are in its cache. That's why full_page_writes should be safe on a system with BBU as Bruce is suggesting. But I'd like to see some independent proof of that fact, that includes some targeted tests users can run, before we start recommending that practice. -- Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: