Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CBEFE1B.7050505@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby
Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 20.10.2010 17:32, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >>> pg_is_in_recovery() returns a bool, are you proposing to change that? >> >> No. I just thought about adding more condition when it returns true. > > Here is the patch. Comments are welcome! >... > Datum > pg_is_in_recovery(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > { > ! /* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */ > ! volatile WalRcvData *walrcv = WalRcv; > ! > ! PG_RETURN_BOOL(RecoveryInProgress()&& walrcv->walRcvState == WALRCV_RUNNING); > } > This returns 'false' if you're in hot standby mode running against an archive. That seems wrong, I don't think the walreceiver state should play any role in this. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: