Re: max_wal_senders must die
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_wal_senders must die |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CBDC20D.70201@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | max_wal_senders must die (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_wal_senders must die
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Under what bizarre set of circumstances would anyone have runaway > connections from replicas to the master? Cloud computing deployments where additional replicas are brought up automatically in response to demand. It's easy to imagine a situation where a standby instance is spawned, starts to sync, and that additional load triggers *another* standby to come on board; repeat until the master is doing nothing but servicing standby sync requests. max_wal_senders provides a safety value for that. I think Magnus's idea to bump the default to 5 triages the worst of the annoyance here, without dropping the feature (which has uses) or waiting for new development to complete. I'd be in favor of just committing that change right now, before it gets forgotten about, and then if nobody else gets around to further work at least something improved here for 9.1. -- Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: