Re: WIP: extensible enums
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: extensible enums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CBB17BC.3080508@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: extensible enums (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/17/2010 10:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 10/17/2010 05:30 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote: >>> I just thought of another corner case, which can lead to a crash. The >>> comparison code assumes that the number of elements in the enumeration >>> is constant during a query, but that's not necessarily the case. >>> ... >>> Of course that's a pathalogical example, but we should protect against >>> it, preferrably without compromising performance in more normal cases. >> Yeah, good point. But how do we manage that? > Why is it crashing? I can see that this sort of thing might lead to > nonsensical answers, but a crash is harder to understand. > > regards, tom "haven't read the patch" lane Heh. I've been deep in buildfarm work, but I'll look at this now to see what I can find. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: