Re: Constraint: string length must be 32 chars
От | Rob Sargent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Constraint: string length must be 32 chars |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CBA4557.2030203@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Constraint: string length must be 32 chars (Alexander Farber <alexander.farber@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Constraint: string length must be 32 chars
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I just read the "anonymously" part, so I take it you have ruled out recording the given coordinate components directly, in multiple columns presumably? Otherwise it seems you could then do a) a composite key and b) queries directly against coordinate values. Alexander Farber wrote: > Thank you for your advices. > > I actually would like to store GPS coordinates, but anonymously, > so I was going to save md5(my_secret+IMEI) coming from a mobile... > > I have to lookup if uuid is supported there > > Regards > Alex > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Merlin Moncure wrote: >> >>> why don't you use the bytea type, and cut the key size down 50%? You >>> can always format it going out the door if you want it displayed hex. >>> Besides being faster, you get to skip the 'is hex' regex. >>> >>> create table foo(id bytea check(length(id) = 16)); >>> insert into foo values (decode(md5('a'), 'hex')); -- if not using pgcrypto >>> insert into foo values (digest('b', 'md5')); -- if using pgcrypto >>> (preferred) >>> >>> select encode(id, 'hex') from foo; >>> >> Why not the support uuid type instead. Aren't md5s only as unique as the >> source? i.e. The same value hashed results in the same md5, no? >> > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: