Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CB0B87C.3040802@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/09/2010 02:19 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote:This is a continuation from this thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg02153.php
The attached patch allows creating a primary key using an existing index.I have attached two versions of the patch: one is context diff, and the other is the same except ignoring whitespace changes.
Attached are gzip'd patches for archives. Archive shows the previous mail attachments all inline... horrible.
I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a horrid inefficiency. Maybe we could restrict it to text attachments that have a Content-Type with a name attribute that contains the string 'patch', or a similar Content-Disposition filename attribute.
cheers
andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: