Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CAC8FEB.2040300@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.10.2010 17:20, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:26 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> You're not going to get zero data loss that way. > > Ending the wait state does not cause data loss. It puts you at *risk* of > data loss, which is a different thing entirely. Looking at it that way, asynchronous replication just puts you at risk of data loss too, it doesn't necessarily mean you get data loss. The key is whether you are guaranteed to have zero data loss or not. If you don't wait forever, you're not guaranteed zero data loss. It's just best effort, like asynchronous replication. The situation you want to avoid is that the master dies, and you don't know if you have suffered data loss or not. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: