Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CAB3E2D.8000108@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Another check: does specifying replication by server in such detail mean > we can't specify robustness at the transaction level? If we gave up that > feature, it would be a greatloss for performance tuning. It's orthagonal. The kinds of configurations we're talking about simply define what it will mean when you commit a transaction "with synch". However, I think we're getting way the heck away from how far we really want to go for 9.1. Can I point out to people that synch rep is going to involve a fair bit of testing and debugging, and that maybe we don't want to try to implement The World's Most Configurable Standby Spec as a first step? -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: