Re: is sync rep stalled?
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: is sync rep stalled? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CA988B4.4050204@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: is sync rep stalled? (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: is sync rep stalled?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04.10.2010 10:49, Markus Wanner wrote: > On 10/04/2010 09:18 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> With 'replay' and hot standby combination, you'll want to set >> max_standby_archive_delay to a very low value, or a read-only query can >> cause master to stop processing commits (or the standby to stop >> accepting new queries, if that's preferred). > > Well, given that DML-only transactions aren't prone such to conflicts, I > think of this as a corner case. Yes they are. Any DML operation, and even read-only queries IIRC, can trigger HOT pruning, which can conflict with a read-only query in a hot standby. And then there's autovacuum which can cause conflicts in the standby, even if no user transactions are running in the master. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: