Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CA6283B.1010107@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/01/2010 01:23 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > If you want that as a default behaviour: > "For example, to default to pushing only the current branch to origin use git > config remote.origin.push HEAD. Any valid<refspec> (like the ones in the > examples below) can be configured as the default for git push origin." It's just occurred to me that this might be a slightly dangerous setting. If HEAD happens to be your private topic branch because you forgot to switch back to the main branch, it will cheerfully push your no longer private branch. If you have separate git dirs for each live branch, it might be better to set the default push refspec to that branch explicitly. Of course, if you're using the multiple workdir pattern, that won't work because then they all share a common .git/config. But maybe I'm just being a bit paranoid. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: