Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CA43586.7050503@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
That one is fixed. Doesn't look like the incoming path from the main postgresql.org page is completely sorted out yet though now that I check that too. If people start at http://www.postgresql.org/developer/coding and click "Information about the Source Code Repository", they'll head to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/git.html - good so far - but clicking on "Up" from there goes to the 9.0 http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/cvs.html still, suggesting the official repo is the CVS one.
Not sure if that is just cached stuff on the static pages that Peter's rsync change will clear eventually too, or if that's a final piece that needs a backport to fix.
On tis, 2010-09-28 at 02:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> writes:I just made a pass through the wiki cleaning up all of the outdated CVS related stuff I knew of there that this page was pointing to. It's a sequential group of 9 changes to revert if we're forsaken and somehow this conversion stops. Main thing left with obsolete info is http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/cvs.htmlHrm, that page shouldn't even exist anymore. Peter?I've changed the doc build to use rsync so that orphaned files get deleted.
That one is fixed. Doesn't look like the incoming path from the main postgresql.org page is completely sorted out yet though now that I check that too. If people start at http://www.postgresql.org/developer/coding and click "Information about the Source Code Repository", they'll head to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/git.html - good so far - but clicking on "Up" from there goes to the 9.0 http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/cvs.html still, suggesting the official repo is the CVS one.
Not sure if that is just cached stuff on the static pages that Peter's rsync change will clear eventually too, or if that's a final piece that needs a backport to fix.
-- Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us Author, "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance" Pre-ordering at: https://www.packtpub.com/postgresql-9-0-high-performance/book
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: