Re: Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CA36B8A.3050602@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions (Henri De Feraudy <feraudyh@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 9/29/2010 11:31 AM, Henri De Feraudy wrote: > Hello, > I've been writing an application that allows me to edit simple maps. It > involves Postgis but here I think I have run into > a basic Postgres consideration. > I did a bit of editing of a map which involved creating a polygon with a > selection, inserting into a database and reloading > the "layer" where this geometric information lies. > There I was editing quite happily for about an hour and a half. I left > my application and came back to it in the evening: > all my work was lost. > Could this be due to the fact I had not committed my insertions to the > database? > I mean, if you are inserting into a table from PLPGSQL do you have to do > an explicit commit at some stage? > I'm really quite a newbie as you can see. > Yes, you really must commit. Now, sometimes, some languages/tools will "help" you and autocommit. It depends on what language/tools/etc you are using. This is a wookie! If that does not make sense, you must commit! -south park, slightly paraphrased -Andy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: