Re: Documentation
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C9C6C58.4080706@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation
Re: Documentation |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 24/09/2010 10:39, Dave Page a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Documentation for pgAdmin is really weak right now. Just to take an >> example, I don't know where a plugin file is described. >> >> The real question is how we do this. Right now, the documentation is a >> set of HTML files. Which is fine for some people and not for others. >> Kind of hard to get a consistent style. Kind of hard to get a good PDF >> and CHM file out of it. Not sure we really need these formats, I'm sure >> we want a consistent style. >> >> The only way to get all these options, AFAICT, is to use Docbook. SGML >> or XML. I have no problem working with Docbook, but I'm not sure >> everyone feels the same. I really prefer XML because of the toolset we >> can use (which seems, at least to me, in much better shape than the SGML >> one). >> >> Anyone has better ideas? > > Yeah, I was looking at this the other day, but ran out of time. > Looking at using Sphinx (http://sphinx.pocoo.org/). > Seems interesting. Just at the same time, we (Dalibo) get rid of our documents in ReST format, so I'll still have to work with it for pgadmin :-/ Anyway, I need to test it a bit before going further on this. > I really don't want to use SGML or XML. > I supposed so :) -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: