Re: ask for review of MERGE
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ask for review of MERGE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C9B4031.4030400@cs.helsinki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ask for review of MERGE (Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ask for review of MERGE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-09-23 1:31 PM +0300, Boxuan Zhai wrote: > I have just generate a new patch of MERGE command. I haven't followed the discussion very closely, but this part in the regression tests caught my attention: +-- we now have a duplicate key in Buy, so when we join to +-- Stock we will generate 2 matching rows, not one. +-- According to standard this command should fail. +-- But it suceeds in PostgreSQL implementation by simply ignoring the second It doesn't seem like a very good idea to go against the standard here. The "second" row is not well defined in this case so the results are unpredictable. The patch is also missing a (trivial) change to explain.c. Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: