Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C99205B.2050409@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/20/10 10:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 21/09/10 04:18, Josh Berkus wrote: >> ... or did we just forget to remove it? > > Backwards-compatibility? ;-) There hasn't been any pressing reason to > remove it. Any application which needed it (like OpenACS) just got broken when we removed add_missing_from. Let alone the typecasting changes in 8.3. Personally, I find removing GUCS to be a worthwhile goal in itself. We have well over 200 now. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: