Re: Git conversion status
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Git conversion status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C97A487.9020904@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Git conversion status (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Git conversion status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/20/2010 08:05 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 19:49, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 19:34, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>>> Please fix and re-run. >>> >>>> Uh, what the heck. I ran the exact same command as last time.. Hmm: >>>> Stefan rbeooted the machine in between, I wonder if that changed >>>> something. >>> >>> I'm not sure we ever checked that. My comparisons against the tarballs >>> were done from my own run of the conversion script. I'm using C locale >>> here, probably you aren't? >> >> Correct, I'm in en_US. I'm trying a "cvs export" in "C" now to see exaclty what changes. >> Hmm >> >> Nope, doesn't seem to change. I just set my LANG=C, and ran a "cvs export". but it comes back with "-" in the dates, soit seems to not care about that. >> >> ("locale" clearly shows it's changed everything to C though) >> >> Is there a cvs setting for this somewhere that you know of? > > Think I found it. > > debian applies a patch to change it. If I set DateStyle=old in > CVSROOT/config, cvs export behaves sanely. I'll re-run with that > setting. actually as I understand it the behaviour changed in cvs 1.12.x and debian applied a patch to provide the old output for backwards compatibility... Stefan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: