Re: BUG #5657: wrong entry in sql_features
От | Thomas Bahls |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5657: wrong entry in sql_features |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C8FB470.3010507@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5657: wrong entry in sql_features (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane schrieb am 14.09.2010 18:34: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > >> On 14/09/10 17:08, thommy wrote: >> >>> -[ RECORD 2 ]----+--------------------------- >>> feature_id | B032 >>> feature_name | Extended dynamic SQL >>> sub_feature_id | 01 >>> sub_feature_name |<describe input statement> >>> is_supported | NO >>> is_verified_by | >>> comments | >>> > > >> Can you elaborate, what is wrong with the above? What did you expect to >> see instead? >> > > What I see in SQL:99 is > > | 3 | B032 | Extended dynamic SQL | > | | | | > | 4 | B032-| <describe input> statement | > 01 > > so I think his point is that the right angle bracket is in the wrong place. > Can't get terribly excited about it ... > And in SQL:2003** in fact it reads | |FeatureID| Feature Name | | 11 | B032-01 | <describe input statement> | so it seems I was wrong and PostgreSQL did it right. :-) I am still curious as I found B32-01 the only entry where angle brackets were used but who am I to doubt the standard. So thank you everybody for the quick answers and sorry for any inconveniences. Regards, Thommy ** got an huge PDF named "Information technology --- Database languages --- SQL --- Part 2: Foundation (SQL/Foundation)"
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: