Re: Monitoring Object access
От | Satoshi Nagayasu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Monitoring Object access |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C8FA8F1.5040606@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Monitoring Object access (adi hirschtein <adiso75@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 2010/09/12 23:02, adi hirschtein wrote: > I'm coming from the Oracle side of the house and In oracle for instance, you use shared buffer as well, but you are stillable to see which session is waiting for which blocks > and if one session is doing the "real" I/O then the other one wait on 'wait for other session" event so you are able toknow who did the actual I/O > the reason behind it is that you want to check which objects is being heavily hit by which business processes or usersand then tier your storage accordingly. > I agree with your point about the OS buffer cache, I need to monitor it as well. > is there any place rather than pg_stat_activity that you think I should take a look at? I think you should also look at pg_locks to know which session is processing (or waiting on locks). http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/view-pg-locks.html pg_locks table contains several lock information including "lock dependencies" which you may need to monitor session activities. -- NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: