Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C899C0B.8060905@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres ("tamanna madaan" <tamanna.madan@globallogic.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres
Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 09/10/2010 04:38 AM, tamanna madaan wrote: > Due to some reason I don’t want to upgrade to postgres-8.1.6. Why? Seriously? If Oracle announced that they were releasing a patch for six critical data-loss bugs in 9i, one of which affected you, would you call support and ask them to make a custom patch just for you that only fixed the one you had encountered? If Microsoft released a patch to Internet Explorer that fixed four crash bugs and a security hole, would you try to extract just the security hole fix from the patched binary and apply only that change? Seriously, this makes no sense. In Windows terms, you're not being told to upgrade from XP to Vista to fix a bug, or even from XP SP1 to XP SP2. You're being told to apply a targeted set of fixes - like you receive from automatic updates - to fix known specific problems without changing anything else unnecessarily. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: