Re: coping with failing disks
От | Joachim Worringen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: coping with failing disks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C7FB999.2060102@iathh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: coping with failing disks (Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Am 02.09.2010 16:32, schrieb Vick Khera: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Joachim Worringen > <joachim.worringen@iathh.de> wrote: >> Would the consistency of the database be affected if all indices are >> suddenly gone? > > The unique constraint is implemented as a unique index. So I'd say > "yeah, you could break your consistency". True. But we could use a separate index space only for our own indices - what if storage for this goes away? > Why not purchase a robust RAM/SSD disk system designed for DB use > rather than hacking one up on the cheap? 15k SAS drives and Intel SLC SSDs are not really on the cheap side (especially in quantity to fill up a storage array), but we still want to get the most of them. Things like RAMsan (Texas Memory Systems) are currently considered overkill here. Anything else (no, not Fusion I/O)? It's a matter of tradeoff between performance and availability. thanks, Joachim
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: