Re: MySQL versus Postgres
От | Marco Colombo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL versus Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C7BBB67.5010705@esiway.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL versus Postgres (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL versus Postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/08/2010 03:43, Tom Lane wrote: > Marco Colombo<pgsql@esiway.net> writes: >> It's a matter of correctness: I see PG as a high >> performance database system. Allowing to start it in awfully suboptimal >> conditions it's no different from allowing '0000-00-00' as a date: it >> may give you the idea you did the right thing, but most of the time you >> didn't. > > Unfortunately, there are quite a few of us for whom "correctness" > doesn't mean "automatically try to eat all the resources available". > Your view of what is useful behavior is far too narrow-minded ... > > regards, tom lane Well, my idea was more along the line of "automatically try to acquire a reasonable amount of the available resources". You know, you don't jump directly from 0,1% to 100%. There's a lot in between. "In medio stat virtus". .TM.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: