Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C77F4F4.4020900@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop
Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott Carey wrote: > But the select count(*) query, cached in RAM is 3x faster in one system than the other. The CPUs aren't 3x different performancewise. Something else may be wrong here. > > An individual Core2 Duo 2.93Ghz should be at most 50% faster than a 2.2Ghz Opteron for such a query. Unless there aresome compile options that are set wrong. I would check the compile options. > Sure, it might be. But I've seen RAM on an Intel chip like the E7500 here (DDR3-1066 or better, around 10GB/s possible) run almost 3X as fast as what you'll find paired with an Opteron 2427 (DDR2-800, closer to 3.5GB/s). Throw in the clock differences and there you go. I've been wandering around for years warning that the older Opterons on DDR2 running a single PostgreSQL process are dog slow compared to the same thing on Intel. So that alone might actually be enough to account for the difference. Ultimately the multi-processor stuff is what's more important to most apps, though, which is why I was hinting to properly run that instead. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: