Re: security label support, part.2

>>>> 7. I think we need to write and include in the fine documentation some
>>>> "big picture" documentation about enhanced security providers. Of
>>>> course, we have to decide what we want to say. But the SECURITY LABEL
>>>> documentation is just kind of hanging out there in space right now; it
>>>> needs to connect to a broad introduction to the subject.
>>>>
>>> OK, I'll try to describe with appropriate granularity.
>>> Do we need an independent section in addition to the introduction of
>>> SECURITY LABEL syntax?
>>
>> I think so. I suggest a new chapter called "Enhanced Security
>> Providers" just after "Database Roles and Privileges".
>>
> OK,
> 

Now I'm under describing the new chapter.
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kaigai/sepgsql.git;a=blob;f=doc/src/sgml/esp.sgml;hb=devel/seclabel

However, I'm wondering whether the topic about security hooks and some
others are appropriate for the "III. Server Administration" part.

Perhaps, it is a good idea a new section at the last of "Database Roles
and Privileges" which introduce a fact that PostgreSQL allows plugins
to make access control decision, and a new chapter in the "VII. Internals"
part.

How about the idea?

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>