Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C742F20.4010405@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated
Backups), open item
Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally UpdatedBackups), open item |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/24/10 12:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: >> Is this method not reliable then? Can something go wrong even if the >> user does exactly what the documentation says? > > It is not. This whole discussion started from somebody reporting that > it didn't work. Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need, and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the main docs. Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1, THEN we put it in the main docs. We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup which isn't 100% tested. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: