Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support?
От | Charles Pritchard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C683282.3070604@jumis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'd originally sent this to Joseph Adams, as he has been working on adding a JSON datatype. I've suggested supporting BSON, as there are many client implementations available, and the format is more efficient than xml and json trees for some use cases. http://bsonspec.org/ On 8/15/10 11:27 AM, Joseph Adams wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Charles Pritchard<chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I saw that you've submitted a patch to add JSON support to PostgreSQL. >> Thought I'd mention that BSON is gradually picking up in popularity, >> and does have a good amount of cross-client support. >> >> That said, I wouldn't be surprised if a patch were looked at with suspicion, >> but it does make sense as a contrib module. >> >> BSON is a binary json format used by Mongo DB. >> >> I don't use it, at all, but it seems like a good fit, and the right time. >> >> Returning BSON would be more efficient than returning JSON, >> for some use cases. >> >> -Charles >> >> > Would you mind posting this to the pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > mailing list? I think a BSON module would be a good idea, as it would > provide a more efficient alternative to the more text-oriented JSON > data type. > > > Joey Adams >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: