Re: WIP partial replication patch
От | Boszormenyi Zoltan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP partial replication patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C659EA0.3020507@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP partial replication patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP partial replication patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane írta: > Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> writes: > >> attached is a WIP patch that will eventually implement >> partial replication, with the following syntax: >> > > This fundamentally cannot work, as it relies on system catalogs to be > valid during recovery. Just like Hot Standby, no? What is the difference here? Sorry for being ignorant. > Another rather basic problem is that you've > got to pass system catalog updates downstream (in case they affect > the tables being replicated) but if you want partial replication then > many of those updates will be incorrect for the slave machine. > Yes, it's true. But there's an easy solution to that, querying such tables can be forbidden, we were talking about truncating such excluded relations internally. Currently querying exluded tables are allowed just to be able to see that DML indeed doesn't modify them. As I said, ATM it's only a proof of concept patch. > More generally, though, we are going to have our hands full for the > foreseeable future trying to get the existing style of replication > bug-free and performant. I don't think we want to undertake any large > expansion of the replication feature set, at least not for some time > to come. So you can count on me to vote against committing anything > like this into core. > Understood. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: