Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C63F21C.4070405@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<br /><br /> On 08/12/2010 08:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:1281617034.4463.7.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com"type="cite"><pre wrap="">On ons, 2010-08-11 at 15:06 -0400, AndrewDunstan wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">You original email said: For some historic reasons, I have my local scripts set up so that they build development instances using thehardcoded port 65432. I think my response would be "Don't do that". </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> Do you have a concrete suggestion for a different way to handle it? </pre></blockquote><br /> Well, I do all my builds under a common directory, and my setup shell script has stuff like thisto choose a port:<br /><br /><blockquote>for port in `seq -w 5701 5799` ; do<br /> grep -q -- "--with-pgport=$port"$base/*/config.log || break<br /> done<br /><br /></blockquote> It's worked fairly well for me for aboutfive years now. No doubt there could be many variations on this theme.<br /><br /> cheers<br /><br /> andrew<br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: