Re: merge command - GSoC progress
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: merge command - GSoC progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C58A3E9.5080408@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: merge command - GSoC progress (Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: merge command - GSoC progress
Re: merge command - GSoC progress |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Boxuan Zhai wrote: > I think there are no redundant lines in this time's patch file. It is much better. There are still more blank likes around the new code you've added than are needed in many places, but that doesn't interfere with reading the patch. The main code formatting issue left you'll need to address eventually are all the really long comments in there. > And, I have tested the running of MERGE command with different > situations. I am sorry that I didn't create regression test files, > because I am not sure how to add new files in the git package. git add <filename> ? The tests you've put in there are the right general sort of things to try out. The one example you gave does show an UPSERT being emulated by MERGE, which is the #1 thing people are looking for initially. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: