Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
От | Yeb Havinga |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Testing Sandforce SSD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C5837C0.6060704@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Testing Sandforce SSD (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Yeb Havinga wrote: > Hannu Krosing wrote: >> Did it fit in shared_buffers, or system cache ? >> > Database was ~5GB, server has 16GB, shared buffers was set to 1920MB. >> I first noticed this several years ago, when doing a COPY to a large >> table with indexes took noticably longer (2-3 times longer) when the >> indexes were in system cache than when they were in shared_buffers. >> > I read this as a hint: try increasing shared_buffers. I'll redo the > pgbench run with increased shared_buffers. Shared buffers raised from 1920MB to 3520MB: pgbench -v -l -c 20 -M prepared -T 1800 test starting vacuum...end. starting vacuum pgbench_accounts...end. transaction type: TPC-B (sort of) scaling factor: 300 query mode: prepared number of clients: 20 duration: 1800 s number of transactions actually processed: 12971714 tps = 7206.244065 (including connections establishing) tps = 7206.349947 (excluding connections establishing) :-)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: