Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Testing Sandforce SSD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C5744F5.3020805@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Testing Sandforce SSD (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> Definately - that 10% number was on the old-first hardware (the core 2 > E6600). After reading my post and the 185MBps with 18500 reads/s number > I was a bit suspicious whether I did the tests on the new hardware with > 4K, because 185MBps / 18500 reads/s is ~10KB / read, so I thought thats > a lot closer to 8KB than 4KB. I checked with show block_size and it was > 4K. Then I redid the tests on the new server with the default 8KB > blocksize and got about 4700 tps (TPC-B/300)... 67/47 = 1.47. So it > seems that on newer hardware, the difference is larger than 10%. That doesn't make much sense unless there's some special advantage to a 4K blocksize with the hardware itself. Can you just do a basic filesystem test (like Bonnie++) with a 4K vs. 8K blocksize? Also, are you running your pgbench tests more than once, just to account for randomizing? -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: