Re: Which CMS/Ecommerce/Shopping cart ?
От | Brad Nicholson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Which CMS/Ecommerce/Shopping cart ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C51D6B2.6090806@ca.afilias.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Which CMS/Ecommerce/Shopping cart ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Which CMS/Ecommerce/Shopping cart ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10-07-29 02:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Samantha Atkins<sjatkins@mac.com> writes: > >> Why is MySQL so much more popular right now, especially in the >> OpenSource community? >> > I think it's strictly historical. The mysql bias you see in so > many web tools was established in the late 90s, a time when mysql > worked reasonably well (at least according to the mysql developers' > notion of "reasonably well") whereas postgres was still pretty slow > and buggy. It took us a long time to get from the original > academically-oriented code to something of real production quality. > We're definitely competitive now, but I don't know if we'll ever fully > overcome that historical disadvantage. > > regards, tom lane > > Postgres also had a reputation of being slow compared to MySQL. This was due to a lot of really poor MySQL vs Postgres benchmarks floating around in the early 2000's. They generally tested stock configurations (MySQL had a less restrictive out of the box configuration) and they tended to test things like how fast can a single client insert/update/delete data from a table. Unsurprisingly, MySQL won, as Postgres imposed all sorts of pesky behind the scenes protection for your data that MySQL didn't worry about. No one really tested it in a way that mattered, which was how the two databases performed under concurrent load, where Postgres won hands down. -- Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106 Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: