Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
От | Mark Cave-Ayland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C5012F5.8090005@siriusit.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > No, the configure test is wrong. Here's what's in configure.ac: > > > dnl Temporary hack until minimum PostgreSQL version is 8.5: > dnl If PostgreSQL < 8.5 is detected, trigger the inclusion of the > new versioned PGXS targets > PGXSOVERRIDE=0 > if test ! "$PGSQL_MINOR_VERSION" -ge 5; then > PGXSOVERRIDE=1 > fi > > > Of course, we don't have any such thing as 8.5. Ah wait - I see. The fix is in already in the 1.5 branch, it just hasn't hit a release yet :( http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/changeset/5421/branches/1.5/configure.ac Looks like we need to push a new release in time for 9.0... ATB, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect PostgreSQL - PostGIS Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom http://www.siriusit.co.uk t: +44 870 608 0063 Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: