Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Testing Sandforce SSD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C4DE5C9.8090004@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Testing Sandforce SSD (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
Re: Testing Sandforce SSD |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Yeb Havinga wrote: > I did some ext3,ext4,xfs,jfs and also ext2 tests on the just-in-memory > read/write test. (scale 300) No real winners or losers, though ext2 > isn't really faster and the manual need for fix (y) during boot makes > it impractical in its standard configuration. That's what happens every time I try it too. The theoretical benefits of ext2 for hosting PostgreSQL just don't translate into significant performance increases on database oriented tests, certainly not ones that would justify the downside of having fsck issues come back again. Glad to see that holds true on this hardware too. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: