Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C49E821.8060206@cs.helsinki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/23/2010 10:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Marko Tiikkaja > <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: >> Currently, I'm trying to make wCTEs behave a bit like RULEs do. But if >> every rewrite product takes a new snapshot, wCTEs will behave very >> unpredictably. >> >> But because EXPLAIN ANALYZE does *not* take a new snapshot for every rewrite >> product, I'm starting to think that maybe this isn't the behaviour we wanted >> to begin with? > > Where should I be looking in the code for this? ProcessQuery() and ExplainOnePlan(). ProcessQuery calls PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot()) for every statement while ExplainOnePlan calls PushUpdatedSnapshot(GetActiveSnapshot()). Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: