Re: transactions within stored procedures
От | Robot Tom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: transactions within stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C46C14E.6060003@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: transactions within stored procedures
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, Has there been any progress on nested transactions in the last 10 years? I am in a situation where I have a script that executes a number of functions that build and populate a database including a rather large lookup table (80GB) along with a number of large indexes (10GB). I am trying to place the contents of this script into a single function so that the database can be backed up and contain all of the code that is needed to rebuild it via a single function call. The problem is that if I were to run all of these functions in a single transaction, postgresql would run out of memory pretty quickly and it would all fail. Since you can't set autocommit off and explicitly control transaction handling in a function (I think..), my dreams of encapsulating all of the scripting for the project in the database and simplifying the build procedure are no more. I would appreciate any thoughts or suggestions.. Cheers, Tom
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: