Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C41E306.7090205@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/17/2010 09:25 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > I was concerned about its interaction with the other serializable > patch (by myself and Dan Ports), so I also combined the patches and > tested. Florian's pgbench test did expose bugs in the *other* > patch, which I then fixed in the combined setting. There was still > some breakage in the other patch when Florian's patch was backed > out, so at the moment, this patch would appear to be a > *prerequisite* for the other. (That can hopefully be corrected > by changes to the other patch.) I am currently reading the Cahill paper [1] in preparation for reviewing your patch [2]. Should I be installing Florian's patch in addition to yours when I start testing? Also, where can I get the latest and greatest version of your patch? Thanks, Joe [1] http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/5353/1/michael-cahill-2009-thesis.pdf [2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=310 -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: