Re: SHOW TABLES
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SHOW TABLES |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C40B004.6070106@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SHOW TABLES (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SHOW TABLES
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16/07/10 21:32, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 20:52 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I have nothing against SHOW TABLES > > ...but SHOW wins, based on numbers of people expecting that I'm not sure I buy that, but even if it's true, it doesn't seem fair to do a favor to one group of users, leaving the rest stranded and excluded forever. Even if SHOW TABLES has a bigger mind-share than the others, surely the others are not negligible either. >> , but if we're going to cater to people migrating from MySQL, I >> feel we should cater to people migrating from other products too. But >> surely we're not going to implement 10 different syntaxes for the same >> thing! We could, however, give a hint in the syntax error in all those >> cases. > > That's a very sensible suggestion, we should give a hint for all common > commands SHOW, LIST, etc., even though we pick just one to implement. I'm suggesting that we should just add the hint for all of those and be done with it. >> doing people a favor by introducing them to the backslash >> commands > > That's a sentence I never thought to see written down :-). They're not that bad IMHO. \d is short, which is nice. \d and \df are the commands I routinely use and remember, for anything more advanced I have to resort to \h. The SHOW TABLES command wouldn't do more than that anyway. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: